<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Net Density &#187; train</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netdensity.net/tag/train/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netdensity.net</link>
	<description>Urban planning, sustainability and technology from a planner and armchair philosopher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:11:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Year News &#8211; Trains, Plans, and Automobiles (miles traveled)</title>
		<link>http://netdensity.net/2010/01/07/731/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-year-news-trains-plans-and-automobiles-miles-traveled</link>
		<comments>http://netdensity.net/2010/01/07/731/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mndot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north loop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdensity.net/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What with the holidays and all, Net Density has been on a bit of a hiatus.  Many pieces of news dropped while I was enjoying some relaxation, and in order to catch up I simply don&#8217;t have time to give them all the detail they deserve.  So, instead of skipping them altogether, I&#8217;ll try to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netdensity.net/2010/01/07/731/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a fast train to Chicago fast enough, or do we need real &#8220;high-speed&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://netdensity.net/2009/05/12/241/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=is-a-fast-train-to-chicago-fast-enough-or-do-we-need-real-high-speed</link>
		<comments>http://netdensity.net/2009/05/12/241/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high speed rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdensityblog.slotterback.net/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Strib tackles the question of whether new rail service between Minneapolis and Chicago is really going to be fast enough.  As you may already know, the proposed line to Chicago will not travel at a European-style 200+ miles per hour, it will cruise along at 78, possibly reaching 110 in some stretches.  The current [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netdensity.net/2009/05/12/241/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you care which route the Southwest Transitway takes?</title>
		<link>http://netdensity.net/2008/10/22/111/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=do-you-care-which-route-the-southwest-transitway-takes</link>
		<comments>http://netdensity.net/2008/10/22/111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hennepin county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lrt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdensityblog.slotterback.net/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hennepin County is now accepting comments for the Scoping stage of the Draft EIS on the Southwest Transitway light rail line.  Submit comments online, or at the final Scoping Meeting on October 23rd.  If you care about the alignment in Minneapolis, tell them what you think.  I&#8217;m holding back my opinion (see note below), although [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netdensity.net/2008/10/22/111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strib weighs in on Minneapolis to Duluth rail project</title>
		<link>http://netdensity.net/2008/10/13/95/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=strib-weighs-in-on-minneapolis-to-duluth-rail-project</link>
		<comments>http://netdensity.net/2008/10/13/95/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duluth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern lights express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdensityblog.slotterback.net/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Star Tribune says yes to the proposed high-speed rail line between Minnepolis and Duluth.  Some highlights: it may be able to support itself financially if it ran 110 mph and stopped at the Grand Casino in Hinckley, it will cost $400 million, and it would make the trip in two hours (again, assuming 110 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netdensity.net/2008/10/13/95/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
