<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Net Density &#187; fta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netdensity.net/tag/fta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netdensity.net</link>
	<description>Urban planning, sustainability and technology from a planner and armchair philosopher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:11:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federally funding for transit projects now to consider &#8220;livability&#8221;, analysis no longer dominated by cost-effectiveness</title>
		<link>http://netdensity.net/2010/01/25/746/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=federally-funding-for-transit-projects-now-to-consider-livability-analysis-no-longer-dominated-by-cost-effectiveness</link>
		<comments>http://netdensity.net/2010/01/25/746/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[livability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdensity.net/?p=746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Transport Politic has the best summary of the changes to the FTA&#8217;s New Starts program funding.  In analyzing competing projects nationwide, the government: &#8230;will eliminate a policy-making rule that gives projects’ “cost-effectiveness” primacy when choosing how to distribute transit funds. Once the shift has undergone an internal review and been submitted to public comment, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netdensity.net/2010/01/25/746/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
